| Title | L’intellect - Compendium du livre De l’âme |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin |
| Series | Sic et Non |
| Categories | De anima, Psychology, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Commentary, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Jean-Baptiste Brenet , David Wirmer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Le Compendium du livre De l’âme d’Aristote (Muḫtaṣar Kitāb al-nafs) compte parmi les premières œuvres d’exégète d’Averroès. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l’intellect qui contient l’essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son œuvre. Ce qui l’occupe est d’établir si l’acte de l’intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-même éternelle ou bien engendrée et corruptible. L’auteur montre que nos concepts sont en vérité ambivalents et que s’ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur confère une forme de potentialité. C’est sur cette puissance que l’accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacité de penser? quel peut-être son substrat? qu’est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu’où? L’édition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu’il fut plusieurs fois révisé et son intérêt est double. Il montre à la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averroès, disciple de son prédécesseur andalou Ibn Bāğğa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la réviser. Averroès est connu dans l’histoire comme l’auteur du Grand Commentaire du traité De l’âme. C’est dans ce texte du Compendium qu’on voit s’en profiler la doctrine. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5415","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5415,"authors_free":[{"id":6280,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":6281,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}},{"id":6282,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":140,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"David Wirmer","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Wirmer","norm_person":{"id":140,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Wirmer","full_name":"David Wirmer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134066669","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/13518425","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=David Wirmer"}}],"entry_title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me"},"abstract":"Le Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me d\u2019Aristote (Mu\u1e2bta\u1e63ar Kit\u0101b al-nafs) compte parmi les premi\u00e8res \u0153uvres d\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8te d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l\u2019intellect qui contient l\u2019essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son \u0153uvre. Ce qui l\u2019occupe est d\u2019\u00e9tablir si l\u2019acte de l\u2019intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-m\u00eame \u00e9ternelle ou bien engendr\u00e9e et corruptible. L\u2019auteur montre que nos concepts sont en v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ambivalents et que s\u2019ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur conf\u00e8re une forme de potentialit\u00e9. C\u2019est sur cette puissance que l\u2019accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacit\u00e9 de penser? quel peut-\u00eatre son substrat? qu\u2019est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu\u2019o\u00f9?\r\nL\u2019\u00e9dition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu\u2019il fut plusieurs fois r\u00e9vis\u00e9 et son int\u00e9r\u00eat est double. Il montre \u00e0 la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averro\u00e8s, disciple de son pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseur andalou Ibn B\u0101\u011f\u011fa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la r\u00e9viser. Averro\u00e8s est connu dans l\u2019histoire comme l\u2019auteur du Grand Commentaire du trait\u00e9 De l\u2019\u00e2me. C\u2019est dans ce texte du Compendium qu\u2019on voit s\u2019en profiler la doctrine.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":2},{"id":140,"full_name":"David Wirmer","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5415,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin ","series":"Sic et Non","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 215–247 |
| Categories | Psychology, Commentary, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | L’intellect - Compendium du livre De l’âme |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin |
| Series | Sic et Non |
| Categories | De anima, Psychology, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Commentary, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Jean-Baptiste Brenet , David Wirmer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Le Compendium du livre De l’âme d’Aristote (Muḫtaṣar Kitāb al-nafs) compte parmi les premières œuvres d’exégète d’Averroès. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l’intellect qui contient l’essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son œuvre. Ce qui l’occupe est d’établir si l’acte de l’intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-même éternelle ou bien engendrée et corruptible. L’auteur montre que nos concepts sont en vérité ambivalents et que s’ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur confère une forme de potentialité. C’est sur cette puissance que l’accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacité de penser? quel peut-être son substrat? qu’est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu’où? L’édition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu’il fut plusieurs fois révisé et son intérêt est double. Il montre à la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averroès, disciple de son prédécesseur andalou Ibn Bāğğa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la réviser. Averroès est connu dans l’histoire comme l’auteur du Grand Commentaire du traité De l’âme. C’est dans ce texte du Compendium qu’on voit s’en profiler la doctrine. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5415","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5415,"authors_free":[{"id":6280,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":6281,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}},{"id":6282,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":140,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"David Wirmer","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Wirmer","norm_person":{"id":140,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Wirmer","full_name":"David Wirmer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134066669","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/13518425","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=David Wirmer"}}],"entry_title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me"},"abstract":"Le Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me d\u2019Aristote (Mu\u1e2bta\u1e63ar Kit\u0101b al-nafs) compte parmi les premi\u00e8res \u0153uvres d\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8te d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l\u2019intellect qui contient l\u2019essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son \u0153uvre. Ce qui l\u2019occupe est d\u2019\u00e9tablir si l\u2019acte de l\u2019intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-m\u00eame \u00e9ternelle ou bien engendr\u00e9e et corruptible. L\u2019auteur montre que nos concepts sont en v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ambivalents et que s\u2019ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur conf\u00e8re une forme de potentialit\u00e9. C\u2019est sur cette puissance que l\u2019accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacit\u00e9 de penser? quel peut-\u00eatre son substrat? qu\u2019est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu\u2019o\u00f9?\r\nL\u2019\u00e9dition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu\u2019il fut plusieurs fois r\u00e9vis\u00e9 et son int\u00e9r\u00eat est double. Il montre \u00e0 la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averro\u00e8s, disciple de son pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseur andalou Ibn B\u0101\u011f\u011fa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la r\u00e9viser. Averro\u00e8s est connu dans l\u2019histoire comme l\u2019auteur du Grand Commentaire du trait\u00e9 De l\u2019\u00e2me. C\u2019est dans ce texte du Compendium qu\u2019on voit s\u2019en profiler la doctrine.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":2},{"id":140,"full_name":"David Wirmer","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5415,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin ","series":"Sic et Non","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me"]}
| Title | S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 215–247 |
| Categories | Psychology, Commentary, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":["S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"]}